Repository navigation
[nlp-analysis] Copilot PR Conversation NLP Analysis - 2026-10-22 #71107
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-10-23T10:29:22.976Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🤖 Copilot PR Conversation NLP Analysis - 2026-10-22
Executive Summary
Period: last 7 days (merged PRs)
PRs analyzed: 67
Messages: 0 comments, 0 reviews, 0 review comments (comment data files were empty; analysis used 67 PR titles + 67 PR bodies = 134 texts)
Average sentiment: -0.028 (neutral)
Sentiment
Within PR descriptions, polarity rises slightly from early (-0.033) to middle (-0.015) to late (-0.005) sections. Negative scores mostly reflect problem-description wording (failure, error, fix), not tone.
Topics
Keywords
Top terms: model (363), agent (174), run (133), smoke (108), sub (103), claude (96), session (90), models (85), awf (78), routing (76).
Conversation Patterns
Highlights
Historical Context
Note: earlier rows used a different window/PR count.
Recommendations
{}); restore comment fetching so conversation analysis is possible.Methodology
TextBlob sentiment, TF-IDF + K-means (k=5), n-gram frequency (1–3), regex cleaning and stopword removal.
Generated by the Copilot PR Conversation NLP Analysis workflow.
All reactions