Skip to content

no-ad-hoc-jsonl-parser: isLineSource doesn't traverse ConditionalExpression, missing live ad-hoc parse in conclusion_admission.c #71028

Open

Description

@github-actions

Summary

no-ad-hoc-jsonl-parser's isLineSource() helper (eslint-factory/src/rules/no-ad-hoc-jsonl-parser.ts:76-98) only resolves a variable's "line-ness" through one hop of identifier-to-initializer resolution (Identifier → initializer()) and through a small whitelist of chained CallExpression methods (split, filter, slice, reverse, toReversed). It never unwraps a ConditionalExpression (ternary) to check whether either branch is itself a line source. Any line array built behind a ternary — a very ordinary "empty vs. split" guard — escapes detection entirely, including when it is subsequently JSON.parse'd per-element, which is exactly the ad-hoc-parsing idiom this rule exists to catch.

Live, grounded false negative

actions/setup/js/conclusion_admission.cjs:50-54:

const lines = compact.session === "" ? [] : compact.session.split("\n");
if (lines.at(-1) === "") lines.pop();
if ((!compact.session.endsWith("\n") && compact.session !== "") || lines.length !== compact.included_events) throw new AdmissionError();
try {
  const projected = compactUnifiedSession(lines.map(line => JSON.parse(line)));

This is a manual split-by-newline followed by .map(line => JSON.parse(line)) — the canonical pattern the rule is designed to flag (compare to the rule's own invalid test case const lines = text.split((r/redacted)?\n/); ... JSON.parse(line)). It is not wrapped by iterateJsonl/iterateJsonlEvents/JsonlParser from jsonl_helpers.cjs, yet the rule produces zero diagnostic here.

Root cause

Tracing lines in isLineSource():

  1. lines is an Identifier → initializer(node) returns its VariableDeclarator init, which is the ConditionalExpression compact.session === "" ? [] : compact.session.split("\n").
  2. isLineSource(conditionalExpr) hits if (node.type !== "CallExpression") return false; (line 83) immediately, since ConditionalExpression is neither Identifier nor CallExpression.
  3. Because isLineSource(lines) is false, the CallExpression visitor's lineArray check for lines.map(...) (arrayCallbacks.has("map") && isLineSource(node.callee.object)) never marks line as a line binding, so the later JSON.parse(line) inside the map callback is never reported.

The same gap applies to fromLine() (used for the Program:exit cross-call propagation pass), which also only descends through Identifier/ArrayExpression/MemberExpression(computed)/a small CallExpression method whitelist — no ConditionalExpression handling there either.

Proposed fix

In isLineSource() (and ideally the equivalent place in fromLine()), add a branch: if (node.type === "ConditionalExpression") return isLineSource(node.consequent, seen) || isLineSource(node.alternate, seen);. This directly fixes the cond ? [] : x.split("\n") idiom; an empty-array consequent is harmless since an empty array can't ever actually be the source of a flagged JSON.parse call.

Acceptance criteria

  • isLineSource() recognizes a ConditionalExpression as a line source when at least one branch resolves to a line source (via recursive isLineSource on consequent/alternate).
  • New invalid test case reproducing the live shape: const lines = cond ? [] : text.split("\n"); lines.map(line => JSON.parse(line)); must report adHoc.
  • A valid-case test confirms a ConditionalExpression where neither branch is a line source (e.g. cond ? documents : otherDocuments) is still not flagged.
  • conclusion_admission.cjs:54 is verified to now be caught after the fix (run against the real file, not just the synthetic test).
  • No existing passing test in no-ad-hoc-jsonl-parser.test.ts regresses.

Scope note

Out of scope for this issue: fixing conclusion_admission.cjs itself (app code, not rule code) — this is purely about closing the detection gap in the ESLint rule so a future regression or similar idiom elsewhere is caught.

Generated by 🤖 ESLint Refiner · claude · agent · 99.9 AIC · ⌖ 0.868 AIC · ⊞ 6K · ◷
Work 6b99120dce1d760d9b16b2c32e2b3939143961ca50ff5820849e9da583d8e97f · Claim c_2d1370e23519794ff88ba3c5ce7e17ee202e9a6904e679f8ad827e073d503dae_3

  • expires on Oct 28, 2026, 8:03 PM UTC-08:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    cookieIssue Monster Loves Cookies!eslint

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions