Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.

Next post mortem meeting date and agenda. #8

Closed

Description

@hhellyer

Date: Friday October 9th 2015.

  1. Use cases identified in issue Identify users and use cases for post-mortem debugging #7
  2. Existing tooling identified in issue Catalogue existing tools for Node.js post-mortem analysis. #6
  3. State of post-mortem debugging tools with node v4.x and upcoming v5.x:
    • joyent/mdb_v8
    • IBM's IDDE
  4. 10: Cross-platform post-mortem debugging tools.

  5. Meeting schedule.

Meeting Minutes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aF5j-tr4fN9i1D5HKqLeIUpFGTG657veu33aMfzmDFo/edit?usp=sharing

Activity

  1. yunong commented on Jul 28, 2015

    @yunong
    Member

    Hi, we use post mortem debugging heavily at Netflix. I would love to join and contribute!

  2. jclulow commented on Jul 28, 2015

    @jclulow

    +1 to @yunong -- would be great to have the wood of production node debugging experience at Netflix behind this arrow.

  3. seabaylea commented on Jul 30, 2015

    @seabaylea
    Contributor

    +1. I've added Yunong to the group membership list used for invites.

  4. lucamaraschi commented on Sep 11, 2015

    @lucamaraschi
    Contributor

    Is there anything already planned for this meeting?

  5. yunong commented on Sep 16, 2015

    @yunong
    Member

    I'd also like to propose we talk about nodejs/node#2764

  6. yunong commented on Sep 16, 2015

    @yunong
    Member

    Also, I'd like to propose that @lucamaraschi join this WG, as he has significant working experience with post mortem debugging.

  7. misterdjules commented on Sep 18, 2015

    @misterdjules

    @nodejs/post-mortem I created a doodle to find a date and time that work for most people interested, please fill it out here: http://doodle.com/poll/ypr7wdgyyg7tix9d.

    I haven't been on any previous call, have you had one already? If so, what did you guys use to do a conference call? Google Hangouts, Google Hangouts on Air, uberconference, anything else?

  8. davepacheco commented on Sep 19, 2015

    @davepacheco
  9. davepacheco commented on Sep 19, 2015

    @davepacheco

    I thought we had added all members to the post-mortem team, but I don't see @jclulow on it. Can someone add him?

  10. misterdjules commented on Sep 19, 2015

    @misterdjules

    @davepacheco Yes, I invited him to the team, as well as @bmeck, @lucamaraschi and @hhellyeribm.

    @jclulow Did you get the invite?

  11. misterdjules commented on Sep 19, 2015

    @misterdjules

    @davepacheco If we get enough people available next week, we will write (maybe even record) minutes, and there's always the possibility to have follow-up discussions on GitHub in this repository. Would you mind if we still setup a meeting for next week?

  12. davepacheco commented on Sep 19, 2015

    @davepacheco

    I'd really like to be involved in a potential discussion of making mdb_v8 more broadly available (which yunong mentioned he wants to talk about), and also the various use-cases for postmortem debugging that I added to #7. But if there's some reason this needs to happen in the next week and a half, I understand.

  13. lucamaraschi commented on Sep 20, 2015

    @lucamaraschi
    Contributor

    @misterdjules can we post-pone it till @davepacheco is back?I think his contributions to mdb_v8 are remarkable and he can be an accelerator for the discussion about porting it on other platforms. @yunong agree?

  14. misterdjules commented on Sep 20, 2015

    @misterdjules

    Sounds good, let's do that when @davepacheco is back 👍 I'll post another doodle shortly.

  15. misterdjules commented on Sep 20, 2015

    @misterdjules

    Same doodle link: http://doodle.com/poll/ypr7wdgyyg7tix9d. Can you please update your availabilities? Thanks! :)

  16. 5 remaining items

  17. misterdjules commented on Sep 25, 2015

    @misterdjules

    @nodejs/post-mortem I sent an invite for this meeting to people who filled out the doodle. @seabaylea I don't have your email address, can you please send it to me so I can invite you to the meeting?

    Also please make sure to mention the topics you'd like to discuss during the meeting in this issue.

    Thank you!

  18. ofrobots commented on Sep 25, 2015

    @ofrobots

    @misterdjules Can you add me to invite as well?

  19. misterdjules commented on Sep 25, 2015

    @misterdjules

    @ofrobots Done!

  20. misterdjules commented on Sep 25, 2015

    @misterdjules

    @ofrobots You're not a member of the post-mortem team yet, do you want me to add you to it?

  21. seabaylea commented on Sep 27, 2015

    @seabaylea
    Contributor

    @misterdjules Can you send it to cnbailey at gmail.com?

  22. misterdjules commented on Sep 27, 2015

    @misterdjules

    @seabaylea Thanks, invitation sent.

  23. ofrobots commented on Sep 27, 2015

    @ofrobots

    @ofrobots You're not a member of the post-mortem team yet, do you want me to add you to it?

    @misterdjules yes please, Thanks!

  24. misterdjules commented on Sep 28, 2015

    @misterdjules

    @ofrobots Done.

  25. misterdjules commented on Oct 5, 2015

    @misterdjules

    Updated the original description to include the actual date of the meeting, as well as additional agenda items. Feel free to update it too with the items you'd like to put on the agenda too.

  26. misterdjules commented on Oct 9, 2015

    @misterdjules

    @nodejs/post-mortem Just a reminder that the meeting is today at 10:00 AM PDT. Please update the original description of this issue with items you'd like to discuss during the meeting so that we don't have to spend too much time discussing what we want to discuss :)

    The link to the Google Hangout is: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/nodejs.org/node-postmortem.

    Thank you!

  27. lucamaraschi commented on Oct 9, 2015

    @lucamaraschi
    Contributor

    @misterdjules shouldn't we start fresh defining what we are looking for and what our goals based on the concrete use cases that we can put on the table?
    I am looking to have a clear baseline for everybody and avoid starting from the tools...does it make any sense?

  28. davepacheco commented on Oct 9, 2015

    @davepacheco

    @lucamaraschi Is that different than we're doing under #7 (which is agenda item #1)?

  29. misterdjules commented on Oct 9, 2015

    @misterdjules

    @lucamaraschi As @davepacheco mentions, I think that is covered by the first agenda item.

    Some of the other agenda items that I added are not directly related to that, but I still think it would still be worth it to at least give a quick status update on them.

  30. lucamaraschi commented on Oct 9, 2015

    @lucamaraschi
    Contributor

    @davepacheco sorry I lost track of #1...but I think it covers exactly what I meant

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions