You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.
@nodejs/post-mortem I created a doodle to find a date and time that work for most people interested, please fill it out here: http://doodle.com/poll/ypr7wdgyyg7tix9d.
I haven't been on any previous call, have you had one already? If so, what did you guys use to do a conference call? Google Hangouts, Google Hangouts on Air, uberconference, anything else?
@davepacheco If we get enough people available next week, we will write (maybe even record) minutes, and there's always the possibility to have follow-up discussions on GitHub in this repository. Would you mind if we still setup a meeting for next week?
I'd really like to be involved in a potential discussion of making mdb_v8 more broadly available (which yunong mentioned he wants to talk about), and also the various use-cases for postmortem debugging that I added to #7. But if there's some reason this needs to happen in the next week and a half, I understand.
@misterdjules can we post-pone it till @davepacheco is back?I think his contributions to mdb_v8 are remarkable and he can be an accelerator for the discussion about porting it on other platforms. @yunong agree?
@nodejs/post-mortem I sent an invite for this meeting to people who filled out the doodle. @seabaylea I don't have your email address, can you please send it to me so I can invite you to the meeting?
Also please make sure to mention the topics you'd like to discuss during the meeting in this issue.
Updated the original description to include the actual date of the meeting, as well as additional agenda items. Feel free to update it too with the items you'd like to put on the agenda too.
@nodejs/post-mortem Just a reminder that the meeting is today at 10:00 AM PDT. Please update the original description of this issue with items you'd like to discuss during the meeting so that we don't have to spend too much time discussing what we want to discuss :)
@misterdjules shouldn't we start fresh defining what we are looking for and what our goals based on the concrete use cases that we can put on the table?
I am looking to have a clear baseline for everybody and avoid starting from the tools...does it make any sense?
Some of the other agenda items that I added are not directly related to that, but I still think it would still be worth it to at least give a quick status update on them.
Activity
yunong commentedon Jul 28, 2015
Hi, we use post mortem debugging heavily at Netflix. I would love to join and contribute!
jclulow commentedon Jul 28, 2015
+1 to @yunong -- would be great to have the wood of production node debugging experience at Netflix behind this arrow.
seabaylea commentedon Jul 30, 2015
+1. I've added Yunong to the group membership list used for invites.
lucamaraschi commentedon Sep 11, 2015
Is there anything already planned for this meeting?
yunong commentedon Sep 16, 2015
I'd also like to propose we talk about nodejs/node#2764
yunong commentedon Sep 16, 2015
Also, I'd like to propose that @lucamaraschi join this WG, as he has significant working experience with post mortem debugging.
misterdjules commentedon Sep 18, 2015
@nodejs/post-mortem I created a doodle to find a date and time that work for most people interested, please fill it out here: http://doodle.com/poll/ypr7wdgyyg7tix9d.
I haven't been on any previous call, have you had one already? If so, what did you guys use to do a conference call? Google Hangouts, Google Hangouts on Air, uberconference, anything else?
davepacheco commentedon Sep 19, 2015
davepacheco commentedon Sep 19, 2015
I thought we had added all members to the post-mortem team, but I don't see @jclulow on it. Can someone add him?
misterdjules commentedon Sep 19, 2015
@davepacheco Yes, I invited him to the team, as well as @bmeck, @lucamaraschi and @hhellyeribm.
@jclulow Did you get the invite?
misterdjules commentedon Sep 19, 2015
@davepacheco If we get enough people available next week, we will write (maybe even record) minutes, and there's always the possibility to have follow-up discussions on GitHub in this repository. Would you mind if we still setup a meeting for next week?
davepacheco commentedon Sep 19, 2015
I'd really like to be involved in a potential discussion of making mdb_v8 more broadly available (which yunong mentioned he wants to talk about), and also the various use-cases for postmortem debugging that I added to #7. But if there's some reason this needs to happen in the next week and a half, I understand.
lucamaraschi commentedon Sep 20, 2015
@misterdjules can we post-pone it till @davepacheco is back?I think his contributions to mdb_v8 are remarkable and he can be an accelerator for the discussion about porting it on other platforms. @yunong agree?
misterdjules commentedon Sep 20, 2015
Sounds good, let's do that when @davepacheco is back 👍 I'll post another doodle shortly.
misterdjules commentedon Sep 20, 2015
Same doodle link: http://doodle.com/poll/ypr7wdgyyg7tix9d. Can you please update your availabilities? Thanks! :)
5 remaining items
misterdjules commentedon Sep 25, 2015
@nodejs/post-mortem I sent an invite for this meeting to people who filled out the doodle. @seabaylea I don't have your email address, can you please send it to me so I can invite you to the meeting?
Also please make sure to mention the topics you'd like to discuss during the meeting in this issue.
Thank you!
ofrobots commentedon Sep 25, 2015
@misterdjules Can you add me to invite as well?
misterdjules commentedon Sep 25, 2015
@ofrobots Done!
misterdjules commentedon Sep 25, 2015
@ofrobots You're not a member of the post-mortem team yet, do you want me to add you to it?
seabaylea commentedon Sep 27, 2015
@misterdjules Can you send it to cnbailey at gmail.com?
misterdjules commentedon Sep 27, 2015
@seabaylea Thanks, invitation sent.
ofrobots commentedon Sep 27, 2015
@misterdjules yes please, Thanks!
misterdjules commentedon Sep 28, 2015
@ofrobots Done.
misterdjules commentedon Oct 5, 2015
Updated the original description to include the actual date of the meeting, as well as additional agenda items. Feel free to update it too with the items you'd like to put on the agenda too.
misterdjules commentedon Oct 9, 2015
@nodejs/post-mortem Just a reminder that the meeting is today at 10:00 AM PDT. Please update the original description of this issue with items you'd like to discuss during the meeting so that we don't have to spend too much time discussing what we want to discuss :)
The link to the Google Hangout is: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/nodejs.org/node-postmortem.
Thank you!
lucamaraschi commentedon Oct 9, 2015
@misterdjules shouldn't we start fresh defining what we are looking for and what our goals based on the concrete use cases that we can put on the table?
I am looking to have a clear baseline for everybody and avoid starting from the tools...does it make any sense?
davepacheco commentedon Oct 9, 2015
@lucamaraschi Is that different than we're doing under #7 (which is agenda item #1)?
misterdjules commentedon Oct 9, 2015
@lucamaraschi As @davepacheco mentions, I think that is covered by the first agenda item.
Some of the other agenda items that I added are not directly related to that, but I still think it would still be worth it to at least give a quick status update on them.
lucamaraschi commentedon Oct 9, 2015
@davepacheco sorry I lost track of #1...but I think it covers exactly what I meant