You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@asottile Can you please explain what you mean? The tool is not dead; thousands of projects are still using it, and the only alternative recommended by it is the commercial version itself, which doesn't solve the need if you are just looking for a simple way to run pre-commit without any additional tool or service. And the readme says it's in maintenance mode, but any attempt for maintenance gets rejected for no clear reason for a while.
I'm not coming here and yelling "WHY DON'T YOU RELESAE ANYTHING!?". There is a clear opportunity to improve, and people are willing to help with it. I think this calls for clearer conversation compared to "read the room" or "go search" (for sth that doesn't exist anymore).
@asottile I don't see anything to be upset about, but I agree that this communication would have been more effective. Thanks for the link and your time.
I didn't miss it. It doesn't cover all proposed changes from the rest of the discussion, so I was thinking there should be another PR to cover the rest. I can still do that if you think it's fine, or we can leave it there as is.
Activity
asottile commentedon Mar 10, 2024
read the room
ulgens commentedon Mar 11, 2024
@asottile Can you please explain what you mean? The tool is not dead; thousands of projects are still using it, and the only alternative recommended by it is the commercial version itself, which doesn't solve the need if you are just looking for a simple way to run pre-commit without any additional tool or service. And the readme says it's in maintenance mode, but any attempt for maintenance gets rejected for no clear reason for a while.
I'm not coming here and yelling "WHY DON'T YOU RELESAE ANYTHING!?". There is a clear opportunity to improve, and people are willing to help with it. I think this calls for clearer conversation compared to "read the room" or "go search" (for sth that doesn't exist anymore).
asottile commentedon Mar 11, 2024
you seem to be so upset that you missed #190 ?
ulgens commentedon Mar 11, 2024
@asottile I don't see anything to be upset about, but I agree that this communication would have been more effective. Thanks for the link and your time.
I didn't miss it. It doesn't cover all proposed changes from the rest of the discussion, so I was thinking there should be another PR to cover the rest. I can still do that if you think it's fine, or we can leave it there as is.
asottile commentedon Mar 11, 2024
please don't