You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Process of proposing (new) specifications may not sufficiently clearly explained #764
Is the PR to " Python Packaging User Guide repository" the PEP itself ? Or it’s a completely different process and shall be done once we have reached consensus in the PEP ?
Is there a template I can follow ?
I feel that these are all legitimate questions about the process that we don't clarify well enough, and we should possibly clarify each of these points in/near the "Proposing new specifications" section.
changed the title [-]Process of suggesting changes to the specifications may not sufficiently clearly explained[/-][+]Process of proposing (new) specifications may not sufficiently clearly explained[/+]on Aug 19, 2020
Activity
[-]Process of suggesting changes to the specifications may not sufficiently clearly explained[/-][+]Process of proposing (new) specifications may not sufficiently clearly explained[/+]pradyunsg commentedon Aug 22, 2020
pypa/packaging-problems#367 (comment)
Another instance of this. :)
hugovk commentedon Aug 22, 2020
Are some of these are answered in PEP 1?
For example, "Once approved [not the same as accepted], they [the PEP editors] will assign your PEP a number".
If so, PEP 1 may need updating for packaging PEPs.