You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There’s no computational benefit to having inputs on the log scale for the CDFs as they’re typically given by transcendental functions and not amenable to the analytic simplifications the PDFs are.
The library should continue with the _log convention, then
we'll change them all in one big pull request. The code
generator isn't set up to understand built in _lpdfs yet.
Activity
syclik commentedon Jul 6, 2015
From @betanalpha on April 29, 2015 14:6
There’s no computational benefit to having inputs on the log scale for the CDFs as they’re typically given by transcendental functions and not amenable to the analytic simplifications the PDFs are.
syclik commentedon Jul 6, 2015
From @bob-carpenter on April 29, 2015 14:18
Even if there's no computational benefit, it's conceptually cleaner to have them match, and it also allows people to write truncated models, as in:
So even a simple implementation in terms of just
exp()transforming the alpha argument would be worth adding for convenience.bob-carpenter commentedon Oct 12, 2016
The library should continue with the _log convention, then
we'll change them all in one big pull request. The code
generator isn't set up to understand built in _lpdfs yet.