Repository navigation
Remove deprecated is-not? predicate - #382
Open
WhyNotHugo wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
WhyNotHugo wants to merge 1 commit into
WhyNotHugo wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The is-not? predicate is not implemented in clients, including Neovim. It won't be implemented, and is deprecated upstream, pending removal. Drop it, making the affected rules unconditional, and enabling queries to work on all clients.
|
Hi @0x1050, Since this repository isn't actively maintained, I have set up a fork of it in the grammar-orchard, a space for collaborative maintenance of tree-sitter grammars. I have integrated your patch there. If you have any other PRs to submit, I would welcome them there and would be happy to onboard you as well. The fork is available on Crates.io, NPM, PyPI and as a GitHub repo as well. |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The is-not? predicate is not implemented in clients, including Neovim. It won't be implemented, and is deprecated upstream, pending removal.
Drop it, making the affected rules unconditional, and enabling queries to work on all clients.