Skip to content

Correct Codex question evidence and acceptance claims - #358

Merged
BunsDev merged 1 commit into
cf3-live-questionfrom
cf3-evidence-repair
Oct 21, 2026
Merged

BunsDev merged 1 commit into
cf3-live-questionfrom
cf3-evidence-repair

Conversation

@BunsDev

@BunsDev BunsDev commented Oct 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Corrects #357's claim that Codex questions are impossible through Modex. The direct plan-mode capture establishes parser/answer compatibility. The separate #348 capture demonstrates a through-app question and answer with the opt-in default-mode flag; human keyboard/VoiceOver acceptance remains open.

Stacked on #357. Documentation only; no production behavior changes. Links the exact published #348 evidence revision and keeps native Plan output support separate.

Validation: inspected the original capture evidence and current backend behavior, independent documentation review approved, and git diff --check passed. Full pnpm build and pnpm test subsequently passed on this head: 1,908 passed, 16 skipped. No new test cases were added for prose-only corrections.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
modex Ready Ready Preview Oct 21, 2026 12:09am UTC

Request Review

@github-code-quality

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code coverage overview

Languages: TypeScript

TypeScript / code-coverage-agent

cf3-live-question b654734 cf3-evidence-repair 1b94a82 +/-
64% 64% 0%

ℹ️ Calculations represent line coverage. Results may change as calculations are updated.

@BunsDev
BunsDev merged commit 0ee67a6 into cf3-live-question Oct 21, 2026
4 checks passed
@BunsDev
BunsDev deleted the cf3-evidence-repair branch October 21, 2026 00:40

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — 1b94a823 Deployed Oct 21, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant